photography of person peeking

The Role of Non-Disclosure Agreements (NDAs) in Employment

Non-Dis­clo­sure Agree­ments (NDAs) are every­where in the busi­ness world. Whether you’re start­ing a new job, work­ing on a sen­si­tive project, or leav­ing a com­pa­ny, you might be asked to sign one. But what do these agree­ments real­ly mean, and how enforce­able are they? Let’s break it down.

What Is an NDA?

An NDA is a con­tract that pre­vents employ­ees from dis­clos­ing con­fi­den­tial infor­ma­tion. Employ­ers use them to pro­tect trade secrets, busi­ness strate­gies, client lists, and oth­er pro­pri­etary data. NDAs can be stand­alone agree­ments or part of a broad­er employ­ment contract.

There are two main types:

  1. Uni­lat­er­al NDAs – One par­ty (usu­al­ly the employ­ee) agrees not to dis­close information.
  2. Mutu­al NDAs – Both par­ties agree to keep shared infor­ma­tion con­fi­den­tial, often used in busi­ness partnerships.

Are NDAs Enforceable?

The short answer: yes, but with lim­its. Courts gen­er­al­ly enforce NDAs as long as they meet cer­tain requirements:

  • Legit­i­mate Busi­ness Inter­est: The NDA must pro­tect real busi­ness inter­ests, not just restrict employ­ee mobil­i­ty (Restate­ment (Third) of Unfair Com­pe­ti­tion § 39).
  • Rea­son­able Scope: The agree­ment must have rea­son­able lim­its in terms of dura­tion, geog­ra­phy, and sub­ject mat­ter (Bode­mer v. Swanel Bev­er­age, Inc., 884 F. Supp. 2d 717 (N.D. Ind. 2012)).
  • Not Against Pub­lic Pol­i­cy: An NDA can­not pre­vent an employ­ee from report­ing ille­gal activ­i­ty, whistle­blow­ing, or dis­cussing work­place con­di­tions pro­tect­ed under the Nation­al Labor Rela­tions Act (29 U.S.C. §157).

West Vir­ginia fol­lows gen­er­al con­tract law prin­ci­ples when eval­u­at­ing NDAs, ensur­ing they are not over­ly broad or unfair­ly restric­tive (Red­dy v. Cmty. Health Found., 298 S.E.2d 906 (W. Va. 1982) (analy­sis gen­er­al­ly applic­a­ble to restric­tive covenants)).

When Are NDAs Overreaching?

NDAs become prob­lem­at­ic when they:

  • Try to silence whistle­blow­ers: Employ­ees can­not be legal­ly pro­hib­it­ed from report­ing ille­gal con­duct under laws like the Sar­banes-Oxley Act (18 U.S.C. §1517).
  • Are too broad: A clause ban­ning an employ­ee from ever talk­ing about any­thing work-relat­ed won’t hold up in court.
  • Restrict employ­ee rights: NDAs can­not pre­vent dis­cus­sions about wages, dis­crim­i­na­tion, or work­place con­di­tions under fed­er­al labor laws (Nation­al Labor Rela­tions Board v. Boe­ing Co., 911 F.3d 638 (D.C. Cir. 2018)).

Best Practices for Employers

To draft an enforce­able NDA, employ­ers should:

  • Clear­ly define con­fi­den­tial infor­ma­tion: Be spe­cif­ic about what is covered.
  • Lim­it the time peri­od: Courts are more like­ly to enforce NDAs with rea­son­able expi­ra­tion dates (e.g., one to three years).
  • Exclude pro­tect­ed activ­i­ties: Make sure the NDA does not restrict legal rights such as whistle­blow­ing or wage discussions.
  • Ensure fair­ness: Courts may refuse to enforce over­ly bur­den­some agreements.

What Employees Should Know Before Signing

Employ­ees should:

  • Read care­ful­ly: Under­stand exact­ly what they are agree­ing to.
  • Ask ques­tions: If unclear, seek clar­i­fi­ca­tion or legal advice.
  • Nego­ti­ate if nec­es­sary: Some NDA terms may be nego­tiable, espe­cial­ly in high-demand industries.
  • Know their rights: NDAs can­not over­ride labor pro­tec­tions or whistle­blow­er laws.

Conclusion

NDAs can be valu­able tools for busi­ness­es, but they must be care­ful­ly craft­ed to be enforce­able and fair. Employ­ees should under­stand their rights before sign­ing, and employ­ers should ensure their agree­ments align with legal stan­dards. As always, seek­ing legal guid­ance before draft­ing or sign­ing an NDA can pre­vent future disputes.

Drew M. Capuder
Fol­low me:

Leave a Reply