Category Archives: WV Human Rights Act

The West Virginia Human Rights Act has moved!

This is really just a heads up to other attorneys. I am still seeing a lot of lawyers incorrectly cite the West Virginia Human Rights Act to its prior location.

The West Virginia had been originally codified at § 5-11-1.

Because of the West Virginia legislature reorganizing last year various part of the West Virginia Code, the Human Rights Ac t has been relocated to W. Va. Code § 16B-17-1.

A bit of detail (probably more than you want):

Continue reading The West Virginia Human Rights Act has moved!

Understanding “Constructive Discharge” in Employment Law—When Quitting Is Really Getting Fired

Introduction
Most people think of getting fired as a clear-cut event—your boss calls you into the office, maybe there’s a stern conversation, and you’re sent packing. But not every termination is that explicit. Sometimes, the working conditions get so bad that an employee feels they have no real choice but to quit. That’s where the legal concept of constructive discharge comes into play.

In West Virginia (and under federal law), constructive discharge is technically not a self-sufficient legal claim. Constructive discharge is a legal doctrine for determining whether a resignation will be treated as a discharge, so that the constructively discharged employee is treated as having been involuntarily separated (terminated, fired). If an employee’s resignation is truly voluntary, then there is no “wrongful discharge,” and the employer is not legally responsible for the employee’s financial harm after the resignation. But if the resignation is treated as a constructive discharge, the employee may have a viable wrongful discharge claim, and may have recoverable damages for the financial harm experienced after the discharge. But the constructive discharge itself is not independently “actionable”–it must be coupled with a legal theory such as sex discrimination or retaliation for whistleblowing.

Continue reading Understanding “Constructive Discharge” in Employment Law—When Quitting Is Really Getting Fired

The Evolving Standard for Hostile Work Environment Claims

When employees say their workplace is “toxic” or “hostile,” they’re often using the term loosely—maybe it’s office drama, an annoying boss, or just a generally tense atmosphere. But in employment law, a hostile work environment has a very specific legal meaning. And as courts have refined the standard over the years, the line between what’s actionable and what’s just unpleasant has gotten sharper (but not necessarily clearer).

For both employers and employees in West Virginia, it’s important to understand what actually qualifies as a hostile work environment under the law, how these claims are proven, and what the potential pitfalls are in litigation. Spoiler alert: just being a jerk isn’t necessarily illegal.


What Is a Hostile Work Environment?

Under both federal law and West Virginia law, a hostile work environment occurs when an employee is subjected to discriminatory harassment that is severe or pervasive enough to alter the conditions of employment and create an abusive working environment.

Continue reading The Evolving Standard for Hostile Work Environment Claims

“At-Will” Employment in West Virginia: What It Really Means (and What It Doesn’t)

Most folks in West Virginia—employers and employees alike—have heard the phrase “at-will employment.” It gets tossed around a lot, especially when someone’s been fired and is trying to figure out if it was legal. But like a lot of legal phrases, “at-will” means more (and sometimes less) than people assume.

In this article, we’re going to take a clear-eyed look at what at-will employment actually means under West Virginia law, the key exceptions to it, and how courts treat wrongful discharge claims. Whether you’re running a business or advising a worker, understanding these rules is crucial to avoiding (or pursuing) a lawsuit.


The Basic Rule: At-Will Employment Means Either Side Can Walk

The general rule in West Virginia—and most other states—is that employment is presumed to be at-will. That means an employer can terminate an employee for any reason, no reason, or even a bad reason, just not an illegal one. Similarly, employees can quit at any time without notice or explanation.

This doctrine has been around forever. It’s grounded in common law principles and reinforced by state court decisions. But, as always, the devil is in the details.

Continue reading “At-Will” Employment in West Virginia: What It Really Means (and What It Doesn’t)

Understanding Joint Employment Under Federal and West Virginia Law

If you work in healthcare, hospitality, or any industry that relies on staffing agencies, franchise models, or shared employment structures, you’ve likely encountered the concept of joint employment. But what does it actually mean? And more importantly, how could it affect you or your clients?

Joint employment occurs when multiple entities—like a company and a staffing agency, or a franchisor and a franchisee—share control over an employee’s work. That shared control can lead to shared liability, especially in wage-and-hour disputes, discrimination claims, and union matters. With recent changes to federal rules and ongoing court decisions, understanding joint employment has never been more important.


What Is Joint Employment?

Simply put, joint employment happens when two or more entities have significant control over the terms and conditions of a worker’s job. That could include control over schedules, pay rates, hiring, firing, or daily supervision. For legal purposes, both entities may be considered “employers,” meaning they’re both responsible for complying with employment laws.

Continue reading Understanding Joint Employment Under Federal and West Virginia Law

Understanding the Interactive Process Under the ADA: A Two-Way Street

Let’s talk about a concept in employment law that often gets overlooked or misunderstood—the “interactive process” under the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). If you represent employers or employees, or you’re an HR professional navigating accommodation requests, this process is absolutely central to ADA compliance.

It’s also one of the more common areas where employers get tripped up—not necessarily by refusing to accommodate a disability, but by failing to communicate properly and in good faith.

What is the Interactive Process?

Under the ADA, once an employer becomes aware that an employee needs an accommodation for a disability, the law requires the employer to engage in an “interactive process” with the employee to identify a reasonable accommodation. The statutory basis is 42 U.S.C. § 12112(b)(5)(A), which defines discrimination to include not making “reasonable accommodations to the known physical or mental limitations of an otherwise qualified individual with a disability,” unless the employer can show undue hardship.

The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) explains that this is not a one-time conversation—it’s a collaborative dialogue aimed at identifying and implementing accommodations that allow the employee to perform the essential functions of their job.\

The governing regulation, 29 C.F.R. § 1630.2(o)(3), puts it this way:

Continue reading Understanding the Interactive Process Under the ADA: A Two-Way Street

Workplace Disability Discrimination: Understanding Rights and Employer Obligations

Disability discrimination in the workplace is an issue that affects both employees and employers. With the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) setting the legal framework, businesses must navigate reasonable accommodations while ensuring compliance. Employees, on the other hand, need to understand their rights and what steps to take if they experience discrimination. Let’s break it down.

What Is Disability Discrimination?

Disability discrimination occurs when an employer treats an employee or job applicant unfavorably because of a disability. This can include:

  • Refusing to hire a qualified applicant due to a disability.
  • Failing to provide reasonable accommodations that would enable an employee to perform essential job functions.
  • Wrongfully terminating or demoting an employee based on their disability.
  • Harassing an employee due to their disability or medical condition.

The ADA (42 U.S.C. § 12112) prohibits discrimination against qualified individuals with disabilities in all aspects of employment, including hiring, firing, promotions, and job assignments.

Continue reading Workplace Disability Discrimination: Understanding Rights and Employer Obligations

The Roles of the EEOC and the West Virginia Human Rights Commission in Workplace Discrimination Claims

Workplace discrimination is a serious issue, and employees who believe they’ve been treated unfairly often turn to the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (“EEOC”) or the West Virginia Human Rights Commission (“HRC”) for help. But what exactly do the EEOC and HRC do, and how does the complaint process work? Whether you’re an employer trying to stay compliant or an employee considering filing a claim, it is important to understand the EEOC’s and HRC’s roles.

What Is the EEOC?

The EEOC is the federal agency responsible for enforcing anti-discrimination laws in the workplace. It investigates complaints of discrimination based on race, sex, age, disability, national origin, religion, and other protected characteristics under laws like:

  • Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (42 U.S.C. § 2000e-2)
  • The Age Discrimination in Employment Act (ADEA) (29 U.S.C. § 623)
  • The Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) (42 U.S.C. § 12112)

The agency also enforces laws prohibiting retaliation, meaning an employer can’t punish an employee for filing a complaint or participating in an investigation.

Continue reading The Roles of the EEOC and the West Virginia Human Rights Commission in Workplace Discrimination Claims

Workplace Harassment: What Employers and Employees Need to Know

Workplace harassment is a serious issue that can lead to legal trouble for employers and create a toxic work environment for employees. While most people think of harassment in terms of sexual misconduct, the law covers a much broader range of behaviors. Understanding what constitutes workplace harassment and how to handle it is crucial for both employers and employees.

What Is Workplace Harassment?

Harassment is defined as unwelcome conduct based on race, color, religion, sex (including pregnancy, gender identity, and sexual orientation), national origin, age (40 or older), disability, or genetic information (42 U.S.C. §2000e-2(a)). It becomes illegal when:

  • Enduring the offensive conduct becomes a condition of continued employment, or
  • The conduct is severe or pervasive enough to create a hostile work environment (Meritor Sav. Bank v. Vinson, 477 U.S. 57 (1986)).

Harassment isn’t just about inappropriate jokes or unwanted advances—it can include threats, intimidation, offensive images, or even workplace policies that disproportionately affect certain groups.

Continue reading Workplace Harassment: What Employers and Employees Need to Know

Wrongful Termination: What It Is and What It Isn’t

Losing a job is tough, but not every termination is illegal. The term “wrongful termination” gets thrown around a lot, but in legal terms, it has a specific meaning. Both employers and employees need to understand what actually qualifies as wrongful termination under federal and West Virginia law.

What Is Wrongful Termination?

Wrongful termination happens when an employer fires an employee in violation of a law, contract, or public policy. This can include:

  • Discrimination: Firing someone based on race, gender, age, disability, or other protected characteristics violates federal and state anti-discrimination laws (42 U.S.C. §2000e-2; W. Va. Code §16B-17-9).
  • Retaliation: Employers can’t fire an employee for reporting discrimination, workplace safety violations, or engaging in other protected activities (42 U.S.C. 2000e-3(a); W. Va. Code §16B-17-9(7)).
  • Breach of contract: If an employee has a written contract or even an implied contract promising job security, a termination outside the agreed terms may be wrongful (Cook v. Heck’s Inc., 342 S.E.2d 453 (W. Va. 1986)).
  • Public policy violations: Employers can’t fire employees for reasons that violate public policy, such as refusing to engage in illegal activities (Harless v. First Nat’l Bank, 246 S.E.2d 270 (W. Va. 1978)).
Continue reading Wrongful Termination: What It Is and What It Isn’t