At-Will” Employment in West Virginia: What It Really Means (and What It Doesn’t)

Most folks in West Virginia—employers and employ­ees alike—have heard the phrase “at-will employ­ment.” It gets tossed around a lot, espe­cial­ly when someone’s been fired and is try­ing to fig­ure out if it was legal. But like a lot of legal phras­es, “at-will” means more (and some­times less) than peo­ple assume.

In this arti­cle, we’re going to take a clear-eyed look at what at-will employ­ment actu­al­ly means under West Vir­ginia law, the key excep­tions to it, and how courts treat wrong­ful dis­charge claims. Whether you’re run­ning a busi­ness or advis­ing a work­er, under­stand­ing these rules is cru­cial to avoid­ing (or pur­su­ing) a lawsuit.


The Basic Rule: At-Will Employment Means Either Side Can Walk

The gen­er­al rule in West Virginia—and most oth­er states—is that employ­ment is pre­sumed to be at-will. That means an employ­er can ter­mi­nate an employ­ee for any rea­son, no rea­son, or even a bad rea­son, just not an ille­gal one. Sim­i­lar­ly, employ­ees can quit at any time with­out notice or explanation.

This doc­trine has been around for­ev­er. It’s ground­ed in com­mon law prin­ci­ples and rein­forced by state court deci­sions. But, as always, the dev­il is in the details.


The Big Exceptions to the At-Will Rule

While at-will employ­ment is the start­ing point, West Vir­ginia law rec­og­nizes sev­er­al impor­tant excep­tions. Here are the big ones:


1. Public Policy Exception — Harless v. First Nat’l Bank

West Virginia’s most famous employ­ment law case is Har­less v. First Nation­al Bank in Fair­mont, 246 S.E.2d 270 (W. Va. 1978). This case carved out an excep­tion to the at-will rule: an employ­ee can­not be fired if the dis­charge vio­lates a sub­stan­tial pub­lic policy.

This is called a wrong­ful dis­charge in vio­la­tion of pub­lic pol­i­cy claim. Courts have rec­og­nized valid claims under this the­o­ry when an employ­ee was ter­mi­nat­ed for:

  • Refus­ing to engage in ille­gal acts;
  • Report­ing ille­gal con­duct (whistle­blow­ing);
  • Fil­ing for work­ers’ compensation;
  • Serv­ing on a jury;
  • Exer­cis­ing a right under law (like tak­ing fam­i­ly leave or report­ing safe­ty violations).

Not every unfair fir­ing is ille­gal. But if the employ­ee can tie it to a clear­ly estab­lished pub­lic policy—usually found in statutes, con­sti­tu­tion­al pro­vi­sions, or regulations—it opens the door to litigation.


2. Implied Contract Exception

Even if there’s no writ­ten employ­ment con­tract, West Vir­ginia courts may find an implied con­tract based on employ­ee hand­books, poli­cies, or oral assur­ances. If a hand­book says that employ­ees will only be fired “for cause” or after a series of dis­ci­pli­nary steps, that lan­guage might over­ride the at-will presumption.

In Cook v. Heck­’s Inc., 342 S.E.2d 453 (W. Va. 1986), the court said hand­books can form part of the employ­ment con­tract if the lan­guage is spe­cif­ic enough and the employ­ee relied on it. How­ev­er, as I have writ­ten in anoth­er blog arti­cle, West Vir­ginia courts have estab­lished sig­nif­i­cant hur­dles for employ­ees try­ing to argue that hand­books cre­ate con­trac­tu­al job security.

Employ­ers can pro­tect them­selves by includ­ing dis­claimers in hand­books stat­ing that employ­ment remains at-will despite any pro­ce­dures or policies.


3. Discrimination and Retaliation Statutes

This is the most well-known excep­tion: you can’t fire some­one for a dis­crim­i­na­to­ry rea­son. Under the West Vir­ginia Human Rights Act (W. Va. Code § 5–11‑1 et seq.), it’s ille­gal to ter­mi­nate some­one because of their:

  • Race
  • Sex
  • Age (40+)
  • Reli­gion
  • Dis­abil­i­ty
  • Nation­al origin

This statute also pro­tects employ­ees from retal­i­a­tion if they oppose dis­crim­i­na­tion or par­tic­i­pate in an inves­ti­ga­tion or law­suit. Fed­er­al laws—like Title VII, the ADA, and the ADEA—offer over­lap­ping protections.

So, even in an at-will job, an employ­ee who’s fired after, say, fil­ing a harass­ment com­plaint may have a claim for retal­ia­to­ry discharge.


4. Statutory Rights (Workers’ Comp, FMLA, etc.)

Oth­er West Vir­ginia and fed­er­al statutes lim­it the at-will doc­trine by pro­tect­ing employ­ees who exer­cise spe­cif­ic legal rights. For example:

  • Employ­ees can’t be fired for fil­ing a work­ers’ com­pen­sa­tion claim (W. Va. Code § 23–5A‑1).
  • Eli­gi­ble employ­ees have rights under the Fam­i­ly and Med­ical Leave Act (FMLA), 29 U.S.C. § 2601 et seq.
  • The fed­er­al Occu­pa­tion­al Safe­ty and Health Act (OSHA) pro­hibits fir­ing employ­ees for report­ing safe­ty violations.

What Employers Should Do

If you’re advis­ing busi­ness­es, the at-will doc­trine gives flexibility—but not total free­dom. Employ­ers should:

  • Doc­u­ment per­for­mance issues and dis­ci­pli­nary actions;
  • Avoid knee-jerk fir­ings, espe­cial­ly right after a com­plaint or pro­tect­ed activity;
  • Review hand­books and make sure they include clear at-will disclaimers;
  • Train man­agers on dis­crim­i­na­tion and retal­i­a­tion risks.

Even when a fir­ing is jus­ti­fied, how it’s han­dled matters.


What Employees Should Know

If you’re coun­sel­ing employ­ees who’ve been let go:

  • Don’t assume that “at-will” means there’s no case. Look at the timeline—was the fir­ing right after a com­plaint or injury?
  • Ask for the hand­book and any per­for­mance eval­u­a­tions or emails.
  • If there’s a pro­tect­ed class or whistle­blow­ing sit­u­a­tion involved, there may be grounds for a claim.

Final Thoughts

At-will employ­ment” is real—but it’s not absolute. In West Vir­ginia, the doc­trine coex­ists with impor­tant statu­to­ry and com­mon law pro­tec­tions. Employ­ers who ignore those pro­tec­tions do so at their per­il, and employ­ees who’ve been fired unfair­ly shouldn’t assume they’re out of options just because “at-will” was men­tioned in the hir­ing paperwork.

The legal land­scape is always evolv­ing, and even old doc­trines like at-will employ­ment get reshaped by new deci­sions and chang­ing expec­ta­tions. Under­stand­ing the excep­tions is half the battle—whether you’re draft­ing a ter­mi­na­tion let­ter or prepar­ing a wrong­ful dis­charge complaint.

Drew M. Capuder
Fol­low me:

Leave a Reply