All posts by Drew M. Capuder

Publisher of Drew Capuder's Employment Law Blog. Lawyer with more than 30 years of experience, focusing on employment law, commercial litigation, and mediation. Extensive trial and appellate experience in state and federal courts. Call Drew at 304-333-5261.
Hostile work environment, Settlements, Sexual harassment, Taxes, Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964

Congress against sexual harassment, part 1: Taxes

Leave a comment

This arti­cle is the first of 3 parts to cov­er 3 Acts of Con­gress direct­ed at expand­ing the rights of sex­u­al harass­ment and abuse victims. 

The series of 3 federal laws on sexual harassment claims

  • Con­gress first in 2017, with the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (“TCJA”), lim­it­ed employ­er tax deduc­tions for set­tle­ments of sex­u­al harass­ment and abuse cas­es where the set­tle­ment agree­ment includ­ed a nondis­clo­sure agree­ment. That’s what this arti­cle is about.
  • Con­gress next in March 2022 passed the  End­ing Forced Arbi­tra­tion of Sex­u­al Assault and Harass­ment Act of 2021 which inval­i­dates arbi­tra­tion agree­ments over sex­u­al harass­ment and abuse claims, where the agree­ment is signed before a dis­pute arose. That’s my sec­ond arti­cle in this series.
  • Con­gress then in Decem­ber 2022 passed the Speak Out Act which inval­i­dat­ed nondis­clo­sure and non-dis­par­age­ment agree­ments in sex­u­al harass­ment and abuse claims where the agree­ments were pro­cured before a dis­pute arose. That’s my third arti­cle in this series.
Con­tin­ue read­ing Con­gress against sex­u­al harass­ment, part 1: Tax­es →
Age Discrimination, Americans with Disabilities Act, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964

EEOC has updated its poster that employers must display

Leave a comment

The Unit­ed States Equal Employ­ment Oppor­tu­ni­ty Com­mis­sion (“EEOC”) has updat­ed its poster that employ­ers are required to dis­play in their work­places. Here is the EEOC’s web site on its poster. Here is an inter­net (HTML) copy of the poster. Here is the PDF of the print­able poster for wall dis­play. The name of the poster is “Know Your Rights: Work­place Dis­crim­i­na­tion is Illegal”.

The poster does a good job of edu­cat­ing employ­ees and employ­ers on essen­tial aspects of the fed­er­al anti-dis­crim­i­na­tion laws. It cov­ers what employ­ees are pro­tect­ed, what employ­ers are cov­ered, the pro­tect­ed char­ac­ter­is­tics about which the laws pro­hib­it dis­crim­i­na­tion, the deci­sions and con­duct of the employ­ers that are pro­hib­it­ed, and how an employ­ee can file a charge with the EEOC. In light of new­er tech­nol­o­gy, the poster has a QR code so an employ­ee can user a phone to jump straight to the EEOC’s web site for fil­ing a charge.

Con­tin­ue read­ing EEOC has updat­ed its poster that employ­ers must dis­play →
Contract Issues, Employee handbook, Employment at will rule

Handbooks and other ways to bypass the employment at will rule

Leave a comment

Part 2 of a series on West Virginia employment law

This arti­cle fol­lows up my pri­or blog arti­cle, The Employ­ment at Will Rule in West Vir­ginia. In that arti­cle, I explained the basic con­tours of the employ­ment at will rule.

With the employ­ment at will rule radi­at­ing in the back­ground, there are many ways it can be mod­i­fied or bypassed. All claims relat­ing to dis­crim­i­na­tion and retal­i­a­tion, for exam­ple, mod­i­fy the rule to the extent an excep­tion is cre­at­ed by which the employ­er may not ter­mi­nate the rule for a spe­cif­ic rea­son, such as age.

Scenarios: handbooks and other promises

But this arti­cle focus­es on con­trac­tu­al or con­tract-like lim­i­ta­tions on the employ­ment at will rule. The par­ties (employ­er and employ­ee) can enter into a for­mal employ­ment con­tract that mod­i­fies the employ­ment at will rule. But I am not address­ing that for­mal con­tract in this arti­cle. I am real­ly try­ing to focus on two scenarios:

Con­tin­ue read­ing Hand­books and oth­er ways to bypass the employ­ment at will rule →
Employee handbook, Employment at will rule

The employment at will rule in West Virginia

Leave a comment

Part 1 of a series on West Virginia employment law

This blog arti­cle is the first part of a series I will write on employ­ment law in West Vir­ginia, with a focus on lit­i­ga­tion issues relat­ing to alleged wrong­ful discharge. 

I will start with the employ­ment at will rule, and will car­ry through with arti­cles on the numer­ous excep­tions to the employ­ment at will rule.

What is the employment at will rule?

The courts have long had a love-hate rela­tion­ship with the employ­ment at will rule. West Vir­ginia, like vir­tu­al­ly all oth­er states, adheres to the rule.

So, what is the employ­ment at will rule? For con­ve­nience, I will define it in terms of the right to end or ter­mi­nate the employ­ment rela­tion­ship, but more about that def­i­n­i­tion in a moment. And more below about the big qual­i­fi­ca­tion on the rule.

One way to state the rule is that both par­ties to the employ­ment rela­tion­ship, the employ­er and the employ­er, have the right to ter­mi­nate the employ­ment rela­tion­ship at any time and for any rea­son (but not for an ille­gal rea­son, and that is dis­cussed below). It is impor­tant to under­stand that those are the two essen­tial attrib­ut­es of the rule: to ter­mi­nate the employ­ment rela­tion­ship (1) at any time, and (2) for any rea­son. Both sides (employ­er and employ­ee) have that right, although the right is almost always exam­ined in terms of the employ­er’s right in wrong­ful dis­charge litigation.

West Virginia’s description of the rule

In the con­text of ter­mi­na­tion (more about that lat­er) the employ­ment at will rule has been described in West Vir­ginia this way: the rule allows an employ­er to ter­mi­nate an employ­ee for:

Con­tin­ue read­ing The employ­ment at will rule in West Vir­ginia →
Ruth Bader Ginsburg, Sex Discrimination, US Supreme Court

Farewell, Ruth Bader Ginsburg

Leave a comment

Courage.

While still a prac­tic­ing lawyer, Ruth Bad­er Gins­burg in 1973 argued to 9 men on the Unit­ed States Supreme Court in a his­tor­i­cal­ly sig­nif­i­cant case, Fron­tiero v. Richard­son, 411 U.S. 677 (1973).

Gins­burg asked the Supreme Court to rec­og­nize for the first time that the guar­an­tee of “equal pro­tec­tion of the laws” con­tained in the Fifth Amend­ment (rat­i­fied in 1791) pro­tect­ed women and men from dis­crim­i­na­tion based on sex. 

In talk­ing to the 9 men on the Supreme Court, Gins­burg stat­ed: I “urge[] a posi­tion forcibly stat­ed in 1837 by Sara Grimke, not­ed abo­li­tion­ist and advo­cate of equal rights for men and women. She spoke not ele­gant­ly, but with unmis­tak­able clar­i­ty. She said, ‘I ask no favor for my sex. All I ask of our brethren is that they take their feet off our necks.’ ” 

The Supreme Court ruled near­ly unan­i­mous­ly in her favor (8–1).

Farewell, Ruth Bad­er Ginsburg.

“And flights of angels sing thee to thy rest.”

(Shake­speare, Hamlet.)
Harless wrongful discharge, Seminars

Drew Capuder Will Be Speaking At Upcoming West Virginia Employment Lawyers Association Conference

Leave a comment

I look for­ward to speak­ing at the West Vir­ginia Employ­ment Lawyers Asso­ci­a­tion’s annu­al con­fer­ence on Octo­ber 12 and 13, 2018, at Hawk’s Nest State Park in Anst­ed, West Virginia.

I will be speak­ing and pre­sent­ing an arti­cle on the Har­less wrong­ful dis­charge doc­trine, which deals with ter­mi­na­tion of employ­ees where the employ­er’s moti­va­tion alleged­ly vio­lates a sub­stan­tial pub­lic policy.

I will also be pre­sent­ing an arti­cle and par­tic­i­pat­ing in a pan­el dis­cus­sion on social net­work­ing & elec­tron­ic dis­cov­ery issues.

Here is infor­ma­tion on the con­fer­ence, join­ing the WVELA, and attend­ing the conference.

Employment policies

Rex Tillerson’s First Speech at the State Department: Lessons for Employers

Leave a comment

Lessons for Employers

The U.S. State Depart­ment has about 70,000 employ­ees. Rex Tiller­son was con­firmed as Pres­i­dent Trump’s pick for Sec­re­tary of State, and yes­ter­day was his first day on the job.

So Tiller­son spoke yes­ter­day to hun­dreds of State Depart­ment employ­ees to intro­duce him­self and talk about their shared mission.

I was impressed by the speech, and I thought the speech could give a lot of guid­ance to man­age­ment about the mes­sage that com­pa­nies and gov­ern­ment agen­cies should com­mu­ni­cate to their employees.

Con­tin­ue read­ing Rex Tillerson’s First Speech at the State Depart­ment: Lessons for Employ­ers →
Americans with Disabilities Act, Disability discrimination, Drew Capuder, Family and Medical Leave Act (FMLA), Seminars

Drew Capuder Will Be Speaking at Sterling Employment Law Seminar

Leave a comment

On March 29, 2017, I will be speak­ing and pre­sent­ing an arti­cle on “The Per­ilous Inter­sec­tion of FMLA and ADA,” at a sem­i­nar host­ed by Ster­ling Edu­ca­tion Ser­vices. The Sem­i­nar, “Employ­ment Law: Rights, Ben­e­fits, and Emerg­ing Issues,” will take place in Mor­gan­town, West Vir­ginia. If you would like to attend the sem­i­nar click here for more infor­ma­tion and a reg­is­tra­tion form.

Here is the agen­da for my speech and article:

  1. FMLA updates
  2. ADA updates and EEOC guidelines 
    1. Expan­sion of what can be con­sid­ered a “dis­abil­i­ty”
    2. What con­sti­tutes “rea­son­able accom­mo­da­tion” accord­ing to the EEOC
    3. Dis­crim­i­na­tion and violations
    4. Review and update writ­ten poli­cies and job descriptions
  3. Over­lap of FMLA and ADA: find­ing the right balance