Category Archives: Contract Issues

The Legal Risks of Misclassifying Employees as Independent Contractors

Mis­clas­si­fy­ing employ­ees as inde­pen­dent con­trac­tors is one of the biggest pit­falls in employ­ment law, and it’s an issue that both employ­ers and work­ers need to under­stand. Get­ting it wrong can mean seri­ous legal and finan­cial con­se­quences. So, what’s the dif­fer­ence, why does it mat­ter, and how can busi­ness­es avoid cost­ly mistakes?

Employee vs. Independent Contractor: What’s the Difference?

At its core, the dis­tinc­tion between an employ­ee and an inde­pen­dent con­trac­tor comes down to con­trol. Employ­ees are sub­ject to their employer’s con­trol over how, when, and where they work. Inde­pen­dent con­trac­tors, on the oth­er hand, typ­i­cal­ly oper­ate their own busi­ness­es and con­trol how they com­plete their work.

The Inter­nal Rev­enue Ser­vice (IRS) and the U.S. Depart­ment of Labor (DOL) use dif­fer­ent tests to deter­mine work­er classification:

  • IRS Test: Focus­es on three pri­ma­ry factors—behavioral con­trol, finan­cial con­trol, and the rela­tion­ship between the par­ties (IRS Pub­li­ca­tion 15‑A).
  • DOL’s Eco­nom­ic Real­i­ties Test: Eval­u­ates fac­tors such as the degree of con­trol, the worker’s oppor­tu­ni­ty for prof­it or loss, and the per­ma­nen­cy of the work rela­tion­ship (29 C.F.R. § 800.110).
  • West Vir­ginia Law: The state fol­lows the com­mon law test sim­i­lar to the IRS approach, but courts may also con­sid­er eco­nom­ic depen­dence when decid­ing cases.
Con­tin­ue read­ing The Legal Risks of Mis­clas­si­fy­ing Employ­ees as Inde­pen­dent Con­trac­tors

The Role of Non-Disclosure Agreements (NDAs) in Employment

Non-Dis­clo­sure Agree­ments (NDAs) are every­where in the busi­ness world. Whether you’re start­ing a new job, work­ing on a sen­si­tive project, or leav­ing a com­pa­ny, you might be asked to sign one. But what do these agree­ments real­ly mean, and how enforce­able are they? Let’s break it down.

What Is an NDA?

An NDA is a con­tract that pre­vents employ­ees from dis­clos­ing con­fi­den­tial infor­ma­tion. Employ­ers use them to pro­tect trade secrets, busi­ness strate­gies, client lists, and oth­er pro­pri­etary data. NDAs can be stand­alone agree­ments or part of a broad­er employ­ment contract.

There are two main types:

  1. Uni­lat­er­al NDAs – One par­ty (usu­al­ly the employ­ee) agrees not to dis­close information.
  2. Mutu­al NDAs – Both par­ties agree to keep shared infor­ma­tion con­fi­den­tial, often used in busi­ness partnerships.
Con­tin­ue read­ing The Role of Non-Dis­clo­sure Agree­ments (NDAs) in Employ­ment

Handbooks and other ways to bypass the employment at will rule

Part 2 of a series on West Virginia employment law

This arti­cle fol­lows up my pri­or blog arti­cle, The Employ­ment at Will Rule in West Vir­ginia. In that arti­cle, I explained the basic con­tours of the employ­ment at will rule.

With the employ­ment at will rule radi­at­ing in the back­ground, there are many ways it can be mod­i­fied or bypassed. All claims relat­ing to dis­crim­i­na­tion and retal­i­a­tion, for exam­ple, mod­i­fy the rule to the extent an excep­tion is cre­at­ed by which the employ­er may not ter­mi­nate the rule for a spe­cif­ic rea­son, such as age.

Scenarios: handbooks and other promises

But this arti­cle focus­es on con­trac­tu­al or con­tract-like lim­i­ta­tions on the employ­ment at will rule. The par­ties (employ­er and employ­ee) can enter into a for­mal employ­ment con­tract that mod­i­fies the employ­ment at will rule. But I am not address­ing that for­mal con­tract in this arti­cle. I am real­ly try­ing to focus on two scenarios:

Con­tin­ue read­ing Hand­books and oth­er ways to bypass the employ­ment at will rule