I hope everyone has a great Christmas and New Year!
Here is a picture of my best present this year, a watercolor painting my daughter (age 17) gave me, showing Santa delivering presents to beluga whales (and you can see that one of the belugas is wearing a Christmas hat):
The United States Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (“EEOC”) has updated its poster that employers are required to display in their workplaces. Here is the EEOC’s web site on its poster. Here is an internet (HTML) copy of the poster. Here is the PDF of the printable poster for wall display. The name of the poster is “Know Your Rights: Workplace Discrimination is Illegal”.
The poster does a good job of educating employees and employers on essential aspects of the federal anti-discrimination laws. It covers what employees are protected, what employers are covered, the protected characteristics about which the laws prohibit discrimination, the decisions and conduct of the employers that are prohibited, and how an employee can file a charge with the EEOC. In light of newer technology, the poster has a QR code so an employee can user a phone to jump straight to the EEOC’s web site for filing a charge.
Continue reading EEOC has updated its poster that employers must displayThis article follows up my prior blog article, The Employment at Will Rule in West Virginia. In that article, I explained the basic contours of the employment at will rule.
With the employment at will rule radiating in the background, there are many ways it can be modified or bypassed. All claims relating to discrimination and retaliation, for example, modify the rule to the extent an exception is created by which the employer may not terminate the rule for a specific reason, such as age.
But this article focuses on contractual or contract-like limitations on the employment at will rule. The parties (employer and employee) can enter into a formal employment contract that modifies the employment at will rule. But I am not addressing that formal contract in this article. I am really trying to focus on two scenarios:
Continue reading Handbooks and other ways to bypass the employment at will ruleThis blog article is the first part of a series I will write on employment law in West Virginia, with a focus on litigation issues relating to alleged wrongful discharge.
I will start with the employment at will rule, and will carry through with articles on the numerous exceptions to the employment at will rule.
The courts have long had a love-hate relationship with the employment at will rule. West Virginia, like virtually all other states, adheres to the rule.
So, what is the employment at will rule? For convenience, I will define it in terms of the right to end or terminate the employment relationship, but more about that definition in a moment. And more below about the big qualification on the rule.
One way to state the rule is that both parties to the employment relationship, the employer and the employer, have the right to terminate the employment relationship at any time and for any reason (but not for an illegal reason, and that is discussed below). It is important to understand that those are the two essential attributes of the rule: to terminate the employment relationship (1) at any time, and (2) for any reason. Both sides (employer and employee) have that right, although the right is almost always examined in terms of the employer’s right in wrongful discharge litigation.
In the context of termination (more about that later) the employment at will rule has been described in West Virginia this way: the rule allows an employer to terminate an employee for:
Continue reading The employment at will rule in West VirginiaCourage.
While still a practicing lawyer, Ruth Bader Ginsburg in 1973 argued to 9 men on the United States Supreme Court in a historically significant case, Frontiero v. Richardson, 411 U.S. 677 (1973).
Ginsburg asked the Supreme Court to recognize for the first time that the guarantee of “equal protection of the laws” contained in the Fifth Amendment (ratified in 1791) protected women and men from discrimination based on sex.
In talking to the 9 men on the Supreme Court, Ginsburg stated: I “urge[] a position forcibly stated in 1837 by Sara Grimke, noted abolitionist and advocate of equal rights for men and women. She spoke not elegantly, but with unmistakable clarity. She said, ‘I ask no favor for my sex. All I ask of our brethren is that they take their feet off our necks.’ ”
The Supreme Court ruled nearly unanimously in her favor (8–1).
Farewell, Ruth Bader Ginsburg.
“And flights of angels sing thee to thy rest.”
(Shakespeare, Hamlet.)
I look forward to speaking at the West Virginia Employment Lawyers Association’s annual conference on October 12 and 13, 2018, at Hawk’s Nest State Park in Ansted, West Virginia.
I will be speaking and presenting an article on the Harless wrongful discharge doctrine, which deals with termination of employees where the employer’s motivation allegedly violates a substantial public policy.
I will also be presenting an article and participating in a panel discussion on social networking & electronic discovery issues.
Here is information on the conference, joining the WVELA, and attending the conference.
The U.S. State Department has about 70,000 employees. Rex Tillerson was confirmed as President Trump’s pick for Secretary of State, and yesterday was his first day on the job.
So Tillerson spoke yesterday to hundreds of State Department employees to introduce himself and talk about their shared mission.
I was impressed by the speech, and I thought the speech could give a lot of guidance to management about the message that companies and government agencies should communicate to their employees.
Continue reading Rex Tillerson’s First Speech at the State Department: Lessons for EmployersOn March 29, 2017, I will be speaking and presenting an article on “The Perilous Intersection of FMLA and ADA,” at a seminar hosted by Sterling Education Services. The Seminar, “Employment Law: Rights, Benefits, and Emerging Issues,” will take place in Morgantown, West Virginia. If you would like to attend the seminar click here for more information and a registration form.
Here is the agenda for my speech and article:
Read this article about how Paris supported the United States after 9–11. Le Monde wrote “We are all Americans”. We owe them nothing less. We are all Parisians.
Let La Marseillaise sing for those injured and killed in the terrorist attacks in Paris on November 13, 2015.
From Casablanca:
Maybe it’s the frustrated novelist in me, but I’ve been thinking about literature and law.
This article is the start of a series where, once in a while and for no particular reason, I will focus on thought provoking and even profound statements (by others) about the law. Sometimes the quotations will be from literature, and sometimes they will be from legal writings, philosophical works, and from darn near anything else that makes us think about the nature of law and its relationship to society.
So let’s begin …
Continue reading Favorite quotes about the law, part 1
